Explain Areas of One`s Personal Disagreement with Professional Standards

As a copy editor, I have come across various professional standards in the industry. These standards dictate how we should approach language, grammar, punctuation, and other elements of writing. While I appreciate the efforts to establish guidelines, I have found myself having areas of disagreement with some of these standards, especially when it comes to personal expression. In this article, I will explain these areas of disagreement and why I believe they matter.

1. The Oxford comma

One of the most hotly debated issues in grammar is the use of the Oxford comma. The Oxford comma is the comma that comes before the conjunction in a list of three or more items. While some professionals insist on its use, others see it as unnecessary and even confusing.

I personally disagree with the professional standard of using the Oxford comma in all cases. I believe that its use should depend on the context and the writer`s preference. For instance, in some cases, the Oxford comma can clarify meaning and prevent ambiguity. However, in other cases, it can make the sentence clunky and disrupt the flow.

2. Split infinitives

Another area of disagreement in grammar is the rule against split infinitives. An infinitive is a verb form that begins with “to,” such as “to be” or “to go.” Splitting the infinitive means inserting an adverb or another word between “to” and the verb, such as “to boldly go.”

While some professionals insist on avoiding split infinitives, I believe that they can be used effectively to add emphasis, clarity, or rhythm to a sentence. Split infinitives can also reflect natural language use and enable more nuanced expression.

3. Colloquialisms

Professional standards often frown upon the use of colloquialisms or slang in writing. They argue that such language is informal, unprofessional, and may not be understood by all readers.

However, I believe that colloquialisms can be appropriate in certain contexts and can add personality and authenticity to writing. When used judiciously, colloquialisms can make the writing more relatable and engaging, especially in conversational pieces or creative writing.

4. Voice and tone

Finally, my biggest area of disagreement with professional standards is the treatment of voice and tone. Many professionals insist on a formal, neutral, and objective tone in writing, even when the subject matter is personal or emotional.

However, I believe that voice and tone are essential elements of effective communication and should be allowed to vary depending on the writer`s intent and audience. In some cases, a casual or conversational tone may be appropriate and even necessary to establish rapport with the reader or convey a sense of intimacy. In other cases, a passionate or emotive tone may be necessary to drive home a point or connect with the reader on an emotional level.

In conclusion, while I respect and acknowledge the importance of professional standards in copy editing, I believe that there are areas of disagreement where personal expression, context, and intention should be taken into account. As a professional, I strive to balance adherence to standards with a flexible and creative approach that honors the writer`s voice and vision.